Stimulus Bill: Come to Jesus

Mcjoan says “Maybe it’s time for Obama to have a come to Jesus meeting with a few members of the Dem caucus, Ben Nelson being at the top of that list.” I endorse that.

I also think Congress and the Washington press corps should listen to Nancy Pelosi:

Pelosi — speaking to reporters on the second day of her retreat with House Democrats at a swank Williamsburg, Va., golf resort — was clearly annoyed with Senate attempts to slash up to $100 billion in spending from the $819 billion package the House passed last week.

At the same time, she urged the need for speed in passing the package — and stopped short of saying that she’d insist on her demands during upcoming conference negotiations with the Senate.

“Washington seems consumed in the process argument of bipartisanship, when the rest of the country says they need this bill,” the California Democrat said, seeming to sweep aside the Obama administration initial desire to have broad GOP support for the plan.

The Obama Administration’s desire is to get the damn bill passed asap, and if it can be done with no Republican votes at all, then so be it. Unfortunately, the Senate will require some Republican votes to pass.

Brad Dayspring, a spokesman for House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.), said: “Her comment really makes one wonder whether she understands the concerns of not only the majority of struggling Americans seeking tax relief and job creation, but many members from her own party.”

Are the majority of struggling Americans seeking “tax relief” right now? I don’t think so. “Tax relief” actually is pretty far down the list, except for right-wingers, who need to learn they are a bleeping minority.

There’s much clucking in media about how Pelosi and other Dems are being “partisan” for not standing around smiling and passive while the minority party ensures that the American economy remains bleeped up long enough for Republicans to take some seats back in 2010. Again, the beltway crowd sill seems to think that “bipartisan” means allowing the GOP to have the last word, even after they’ve lost an election.

We are reminded that John McCain is brain dead:

Day after day, McCain has been on the Senate floor criticizing Obama’s package with the core Republican message. “This bill has become nothing more than a massive spending bill,” he has said. “To portray it as stimulus flies in the face of reality.” He has called the legislation an “unnecessary, wasteful bill.”

I saw a clip of that on television last night, and it left me babbling at the walls. Dear Senator Idiot: Do you not understand that “spending” is the bleeping point of the bill? Do you not understand that the crisis requires getting more money into circulation as fast as possible, and only the government can do that? Do you have any brain at all?

I swear, if John McCain had popped out of the wall I think I would have thrown a lamp at him.

Anyway, it looks as if the Senate has agreed on a watered-down version of the stimulus bill. I think Congress should pass whatever it can pass as quickly as possible, but when Obama finally signs it into law I want him to go on television and explain to the American people that the bill as passed was watered down by Republicans and will be less effective than the bill he wanted. Credit where credit is due.

One of These Days

First off, I have a post up on Buddhist economics at the other site.

Second, see Ali Frick, “As Economy Sheds 600,000 Jobs In One Month, Senate Conservatives Ask: What’s The Rush?

I would like to explain to Congress that people are getting genuinely panicky out here. Panicky as in the last lifeboat is gone and we’re still on the deck of the Titanic. See also Paul Krugman.

And as the boat begins to break apart, what are the Republicans doing? Playing games. As Steve Benen says, “The opposition party, when it’s not blatantly lying about the recovery plan, is offering ideas that are a) nonsensical; b) dangerous; or c) nonsensical and dangerous.”

In right-wing rhetoric, all public spending is pork. Here’s a list of the “pork” about to be cut from the stimulus bill.

Head Start, Education for the Disadvantaged, School improvement, Child Nutrition, Firefighters, Transportation Security Administration, Coast Guard, Prisons, COPS Hiring, Violence Against Women, NASA, NSF, Western Area Power Administration, CDC, Food Stamps

It really is time for torches and pitchforks, people.

White House Tails

Michael Shear writes for the Washington Post reports that raccoons have invaded the White House grounds.

The National Park Service is in pursuit of one very large raccoon and several medium-sized raccoons, who have been spotted roaming the grounds around the Executive Mansion and the West Wing, a spokesman said.

“The idea of raccoons on the White House grounds give us great pause,” spokesman Bill Burton said.

Was that pause or paws?

The National Park Service has put out live traps, but to no avail. Local critter trapper Tim McDowell says the NPS probably is using the wrong cages, or cages that don’t smell right. McDowell has offered to catch the raccoons for free.

McDowell has already removed birds that were flying inside the U.S. Capitol, but he says that he’s always dreamed of catching a raccoon on the White House grounds.

An unusual ambition, but to each his own.

According to legend, President Calvin Coolidge had several “unusual pets” including two raccoons, a bobcat and a donkey.

They were Grace’s pets, I think. At least the raccoons were.

The Battle Is Joined

We knew it wouldn’t be easy. We knew President Obama would make mistakes. Let’s make a quick assessment of where we are now.

First, you may have seen headlines that the popularity of the stimulus bill has tanked. Nate Silver says this is not so. It may have slipped a little in popularity, but a majority of the public still supports it.

Second, E.J. Dionne writes that President Obama is not fighting back hard enough against the hysterical and mostly frivolous and misleading charges being made by Republicans against the stimulus bill. I agree with this. Yes, the Daschle debacle threw the President off his game, but that was yesterday’s news. Now he has to start punching.

And lo, Peter Nicholas writes for the Los Angeles Times,

President Obama abruptly changed tactics Wednesday in his bid to revive the economy, setting aside his bipartisan stance and pointedly blaming Republicans for demanding what he cast as discredited “piecemeal measures.”

Obama’s comments were a marked departure from the conciliatory tone he has maintained as he courted Republican votes for his stimulus package through compromise. Against the wishes of his own party, Obama crafted a plan that relied heavily on tax cuts rooted in Republican economic doctrine.

As part of this counter-offensive, President Obama has written an op ed for today’s Washington Post.

In recent days, there have been misguided criticisms of this plan that echo the failed theories that helped lead us into this crisis — the notion that tax cuts alone will solve all our problems; that we can meet our enormous tests with half-steps and piecemeal measures; that we can ignore fundamental challenges such as energy independence and the high cost of health care and still expect our economy and our country to thrive.

I reject these theories, and so did the American people when they went to the polls in November and voted resoundingly for change. They know that we have tried it those ways for too long. And because we have, our health-care costs still rise faster than inflation. Our dependence on foreign oil still threatens our economy and our security. Our children still study in schools that put them at a disadvantage. We’ve seen the tragic consequences when our bridges crumble and our levees fail.

Every day, our economy gets sicker — and the time for a remedy that puts Americans back to work, jump-starts our economy and invests in lasting growth is now.

That’s good, but that message needs to be read to everyone in America.

Meanwhile, the executive cap idea is getting legs and endorsements by most people outside of Wall Street. I think this could be a very popular measure that Republicans oppose at their peril. The Los Angeles Times argues that it would help restore public confidence in the economy.

Finally, as Republicans still are tripping all over themselves to placate El Rushbo, Max Blumenthal says Limbaugh is one of the least liked people in America.

An October 24, 2008, poll conducted by the Democratic research firm Greenberg-Quinlan-Rosner has Rush Limbaugh enjoying a public-approval rating of just 21 percent among likely voters, while 58 percent have “cold” feelings toward the right-wing radio-talk-show host. Limbaugh was the least popular of the all the political figures the firm polled. He polls seven points lower than Rev. Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright and eight points below former Weather Underground domestic terrorist William Ayers.

If the Democrats were smarter than I believe they are (alas), they’d be working overtime to make Rush a block of cement around the GOP’s feet.

Caps and Cans

Edmund Andrews and Vikas Bajaj write for the New York Times that

The Obama administration is expected to impose a cap of $500,000 for top executives at companies that receive large amounts of bailout money. … Executives would also be prohibited from receiving any bonuses above their base pay, except for normal stock dividends.

The CEOs of the financial industry brought this on themselves because they proved they can’t be trusted with money. We saw from the first wave of no-strings-or-oversight-attached bailouts from the Bush Administration that they can’t be trusted with money. You might as well give the bailout money to crack addicts.

Although CEOs cannot directly write their own checks, as I understand it their compensation is determined by the Board of Directors, an insulated group of people living in the same bubble of privilege as the executives. Apparently, boards of directors of financial institutions cannot be trusted with money, either.

Those who are still insulated are whining that a $500,000 cap is “draconian.” Steve Benen writes,

What a fascinating perspective. There are a series of companies that have been managed poorly and are on the verge of collapse. They’re going to the federal government, hat in hand, hoping to get tax dollars to keep them afloat. As James F. Reda sees it, a $500,000 salary is “draconian,” and might lead frustrated executives — accustomed to exorbitant salaries disconnected to job performance — to leave the companies they helped drive into the ground. Companies that would no longer exist were it not for government intervention.

And this is a problem, because … ?

I agree with Steve that there must be some sharp people in the ranks of financial industry management who would be happy to take $500,000 a year. As for those executives who would be insulted and quit — good luck finding work elsewhere, bub.

The bad news is that it seems the stimulus bill is falling short of votes in the Senate. See the Talking Dog for background.

Gary Kamiya reminds us what’s at stake:

We are in a dreadful economic crisis, the worst in the lifetime of anyone who is under 70 years old. Forget the abstract statistic that millions of people are out of work and try to grasp this staggering reality: Twenty thousand jobs a day are being lost. Millions of people have lost their homes and their life savings. Countless millions have no health insurance. Businesses are failing at a staggering rate. Desperate states are shutting down services.

This is not a drill. These are real things that are happening to real people, people we all know. Everyone, whether they’re poor, working-class or middle-class, has either suffered themselves from the economic collapse or knows someone who has.

Try explaining that to the Senate. Thanks.

Daschle Withdraws

Various news sources say Tom Daschle has withdrawn his nomination to be Secretary of Health and Human Services and director of the White House Office of Health Reform. His tax problems were wearing him down. Ezra Klein has a reaction — good for government ethics, bad for health care reform.

It doesn’t seem to be possible to be elected to or involved in government in Washington on any level without becoming compromised. Makes me want to smack heads sometimes.

If you’re interested, I have a post on the other blog that sorta kinda relates — Life in the God Realms.

Groundhog Day

Today if Rush Limbaugh casts a shadow over the Republican Party, it means eight more years of Dems controlling the White House and Congress.

Thomas Schaller writes in Salon,

What is the state of the GOP at the dawn of the Obama era? The GOP has not quite ebbed to New Deal or post-1964 Democratic landslide levels, but it has certainly reached its lowest point since the comeback congressional cycle of 1966. Obama’s 53 percent national popular vote share is the highest for a Democrat since 1964, and there is no obvious set of formidable Republican presidential challengers for the 2012 election.

As Salon’s Mike Madden observed from interacting with volunteers and activists on hand at the Capital Hilton in Washington for the national meeting, “If the mood and the speeches at the winter meeting are any guide, Republicans are seeking refuge from electoral defeat in an alternate reality, one where the public still loves them — or would if they could only improve their sales pitch. And where going along with President Obama’s agenda just isn’t in the cards.” If any further evidence is needed, consider this little gem: On the afternoon the 168 national committee members were electing Michael Steele their new chairman, fully 10 days into the Obama administration, the “national leadership” page on the RNC’s Web site still depicted George W. Bush and Dick Cheney as president and vice president.

I just checked; the RNC page has been changed to congratulate Michael Steele.

Schaller goes on to describe a party that can’t decide where it’s going. There is no leadership to speak of. There are no rising stars that look like viable presidential candidates in 2012, although of course they’ve got some time. Basically, the party has a pack of right-wing extremists in the House who think it’s still 1994; some reasonably competent, more moderate but low-profile governors; Sarah Palin (Schaller doesn’t mention her, but I don’t think she’s done messing with the GOP yet); some aged senators who plan to retire; Jim Bunning, who appears to be brain dead but refuses to quit; and a handful of moderate senators that the base doesn’t like.

As I remember it, as far as rising stars go the GOP was in a similar place in 1996. There was no obvious, dominant, star-power candidate to take on Bill Clinton. The best they could come up with was Bob Dole, who was long past his sell-by date.

But then the GOP insiders must’ve decided that George W. Bush would be their rising star in 2000. So they packaged him as a moderate and began their sales campaign. A perfect storm of public complacency, media complacency (plus corruption, incompetence, etc.), wussy Democrats, the right-wing propaganda media machine, dirty tricks, and a lapdog Supreme Court put George W. Bush in the White House. I firmly believe that were it not for 9/11 he would have been bounced in 2004, but of course we’ll never know.

I’m sure party insiders already have been discussing who they will promote as the next heir to Ronald Reagan and how the heir will be packaged for public sale. I’m not counting them out. If the public becomes disappointed in the Obama Administration the GOP will have an opening, and if the entire party can get behind one guy in the next couple of years they could pull off a comeback. Right now it looks like a long shot, but it’s possible.

My larger point, though, is that the extremist, Gingrich/Rove/Norquist Republican Party has been pulling off a trapeze act for some time. Their dominance of media and Washington has far exceeded the real public support for their agenda for many years. And the ideological whackjobs the base tends to fall in love with are unsalable to the general public on a national level. In 2000 they packaged Dubya as a moderate, remember. And now with shifting demographics — their base is getting older, and there are only so many socially dysfunctional white men to go around these days — there is no way they’ll be able to keep the same old trapeze act in the air much longer.

David Lightman writes for McClatchy that the GOP’s winning strategy these days is opposing President Obama. That’s it. That’s all they’ve got. Oh, they’re still talking about cutting taxes and shrinking government, but is anyone (but them) listening?

The strategy carries enormous risks, however, because it could suggest that Republicans are eager to put the brakes on emergency aid to millions of Americans who are trying to survive what’s fast becoming the nation’s worst economic downturn since World War II.

Yeah, that does seem chancy.

It also creates a risk that the GOP, which no longer has a single House member from any of the six New England states and no senators from a Pacific coast state, is in danger of becoming a regional, ideologically focused party.

“We’re all concerned about the fact that the very wealthy and the very poor, the most and least educated, and a majority of minority voters seem to have more or less stopped paying attention to us,” warned Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

Yes. Well, what’s more interesting to me is whether the Senate passes the stimulus bill, and whether the Dems have the spines to put back in the stuff that was taken out to appease the House GOP. Stay tuned.

Blogroll Amnesty Day

Skippy has declared Blogroll Amnesty Day, so here we are. My blogroll is still scrambled, because we are in kind of upgrade bardo at the moment, but I can still add stuff and hope it straightens out eventuality.

In honor of Blogroll Amnesty, please nominate blogs you know of that are cool and hip that you think I should blogroll, and I will check them out. My own new addition is named Byzigenous Buddhapalian.

Mark Steyn Hates America

Highlights of Mark Steyn’s latest column:

  • He wants us all to get syphilis. The BooMan explains.
  • He repeats a much-debunked Republican lie that the Obama stimulus package contains $4.2 billion for ACORN. In fact, the bill does not mention ACORN. But you know righties — once they get a story in their heads that reinforces their opinions, you can debunk it from now until doomsday and they’ll keep repeating it anyway. Years from now, when both the stimulus package and ACORN have faded into history, they will still believe ACORN got $4.2 billion.

Other stuff to read:

The Nativists Are Restless” — The GOP continues to shoot itself in the foot over the immigration issue.

Frank Rich notes that the GOP keeps promising us “new ideas” but so far haven’t produced any. However, they (although not the Democrats) live in fear of the wrath of Rushbo.