Is It Over?

The most significant fact about last night’s GOP convention finale may be that Here Comes Honey Boo Boo got better ratings. Of these two prime time programs, one was a reality show about a tribe of clueless rednecks, and the other starred a mouthy little girl with a pet pig.

Everybody’s talking today about Clint Eastwood’s bizarre stand-up act. I believe it must have been bizarre, because I did a news google for “Eastwood bizarre” and got more than 14,000 hits. I take it the crowd in Tampa ate it up, but it sounds even more cringe-inducing that Honey Boo Boo.

My impression overall is that the whole convention was weirdly unfocused. And IMO this is in large part because Republicans can’t decide who they are running against. Steve Kornacki writes that Romney thinks he is running against Jimmy Carter, for example. His acceptance speech was supposed to cast himself as Reagan versus the bumbling peanut farmer Reagan ran against in 1980. I personally don’t think Jimmy Carter himself was that Jimmy Carter, although it’s a debatable point. But Barack Obama is way not that Jimmy Carter. Not even close.

David Firestone writes that in his speech, Romney addressed the President as if he were a wayward child whose behavior had been disappointing. I can’t imagine that’s going to work on anyone, frankly.

Other parts of the Republican Party, of course, are opposing Barack “Saul Alinsky” Obama, subversive radical. And some are opposing Barack “Stepin Fetchit” Obama, affirmative action hire. Meanwhile, the real Barack Obama probably is feeling pretty good about his chances right now.

Nate Silver says we won’t know how big a bounce Mittens got from the convention until early next week, so just ignore any headlines about a bounce until then. Mittens needs at least a four-point bounce if he’s got a shot at overtaking the President, Nate says. Nate’s graphs currently have the President’s chance of winning getting larger, and Mitt’s smaller.

And then there will be the Dem convention, and the debates. Heh.

Peace and Love at the RNC

First, yesterday’s highlights. Nice audience reaction to a Latina speaker from Puerto Rico:

I think the guys in white hats are Ron Paulites. Certainly, an enthusiastic crew. I’m not sure about this, but I believe the Paulites were miffed because Puerto Rican delegates got seated and they didn’t.

In other news, two attendees were removed from the convention after they were seen throwing nuts at an African-American camera woman while shouting, “This is how we feed the animals.” The RNC wants you to know that merely by mentioning that this happened, I am playing the race card.

Mystery of the Grumpy Coal Miners — Solved

Remember the coal miners used as a backdrop at a Romney rally? The ones who really really really didn’t seem to want to be there?

Now we know why they were grumpy. Turns out attendance at the rally was both mandatory and unpaid. No wonder they were, um, grumpy.

After a number of miners complained to local news media that they’d been ripped off of several hours’ pay, mine owner Charles Murray claimed he had closed the mine at the request of the Secret Service. And of course he wasn’t going to pay miners to attend a political rally. But the Romney campaign is saying that closing the mine and herding the miners to the rally was Charles Murray’s idea entirely. The photos of the grumpy miners and their families being herded to see Mittens tell them what a great boss they had certainly impressed the mouth-breathing set.

I did some checking and, no surprise, Century is a non-union mine.

The Last White Hope?

white-romneySometimes when righties have a new obsession I fail to make connections to where the obsession came from. Yesterday I saw that a number of righties were calling Mittens the “new James Knox Polk.” To which I thought, They want to invade Mexico? WTF? Not that I’d put it past them.

It turns out that operatives like Karl Rove are circulating the idea that Mittens expects to be a one-term president who will enact a bunch of significant stuff and then retire, as Polk did. And Romney’s staff seems to be the source of this notion. Some of them are telling reporters that Romney plans to “fix things” even if it means enacting unpopular policies and taking the political hit.

John Ward writes,

Multiple senior Romney advisers assured me that they had had conversations with the candidate in which he conveyed a depth of conviction about the need to try to enact something like Ryan’s controversial budget and entitlement reforms. Romney, they said, was willing to count the cost politically in order to achieve it.

The idea that Whiplash Willard would fall on his sword for anything — well, unless there’s a tax write-off involved — strikes me as preposterous, but let’s go with this for a moment. Jonathan Chait writes that Republicans see Romney as the last hope for imposing their vision of America on the rest of us before they are swamped by changing demographics —

A Republican strategist said something interesting and revealing on Friday, though it largely escaped attention in the howling gusts of punditry over Mitt Romney’s birth certificate crack and a potential convention-altering hurricane. The subject was a Ron Brownstein story outlining the demographic hit rates each party requires to win in November. To squeak out a majority, Mitt Romney probably needs to win at least 61 percent of the white vote — a figure exceeding what George H.W. Bush commanded over Michael Dukakis in 1988. The Republican strategist told Brownstein, “This is the last time anyone will try to do this” — “this” being a near total reliance on white votes to win a presidential election.

I wrote a long story last February arguing that the Republican Party had grown intensely conscious of both the inescapable gravity of the long-term relative decline of the white population, and the short-term window of opportunity opened for the party by the economic crisis. I think we’re continuing to see the GOP operate under an integrated political and policy strategy constructed on this premise. This is their last, best chance to win an election in the party’s current demographic and ideological form. Future generations of GOP politicians will have to appeal to nonwhite voters who hold far more liberal views about the role of government than does the party’s current base. …

… Blowing up the welfare state and affecting the largest upward redistribution of wealth in American history is a politically tricky project (hence Romney’s belief that he may need to forego a second term). Hence the Romney campaign’s clear plan to suture off its slowly declining but still potent base.

Mittens literally is selling himself to the Republican Party as the Last White Hope.

See also Thomas Schaller, “Republican National Convention: Heart of Whiteness.”

Let Republicans Be Republicans

I have advice that leftie vocational protesters will never take, but here goes anyway — When your opponent is voluntarily making a fool of himself in public, stay out of the bleeping way.

The Republican National Convention promises to be a hot mess. Evan McMorris-Santoro writes,

Unfortunately for the man who’s just days from finally sealing the deal and becoming the Republican presidential nominee, the Republican Party’s frayed edges are on full display here even as delegates wait for the actual convention to start.

The come-together moment follows a week that ripped open the wounds of the Republican primary that were supposed to be fully healed in time for Romney’s big party.

See also “A Party of Factions Gathers, Seeking Consensus.”

I know somebody’s going to say Republicans always put on a perfectly choreographed show and everyone’s going to snap into place as always, blah blah, and maybe that will happen. But they’ve got a candidate many of them don’t like who can’t get his message straight — he went back to bragging about his Massachusetts health care law this week, which infuriates a lot of them — and more so than in the past there are big factions of rightie activists who put ideology way over party, and who would rather lose than compromise. Which works for me.

Plus, it’s a fact that this year’s platform is the most extreme ever and nuttier than a peanut farm.

What happens at the conventions still can sway an election, IMO. The pundits may disagree, but I think the 1992 GOP convention helped elect Bill Clinton. Clinton was helped by Pat Buchanan’s social war address, Marilyn Quayle’s cringe inducing “I am better than Hillary” speech, and the poignant moment when Mary Fisher, infected with HIV, told the convention that “We have killed each other with our ignorance, our prejudice and our silence.” It was widely seen as a rebuke of the Republican Party, particularly after Buchanan’s hateful ranting about “homosexual rights.”

So I say let Republicans be Republicans. Let them be themselves, and let America see them for who and what they are. Just pass the popcorn.

Mitt: Vote for Me ‘Cause I’m the White Guy

Mitt was planning to run as the Titan of Capitalism and Savior of the Olympics. But those narratives have been tarnished quite a bit, so he’s falling back on the Tried and True and doubling down on whiteness.

Mitt today is saying that this was not a swipe at President Obama

“I love being home in this place where Ann and I were raised, where both of us were born. Ann was born in Henry Ford Hospital. I was born in Harper Hospital,” Romney said in Commerce, Michigan earlier Friday. “No one’s ever asked to see my birth certificate. They know that this is the place that we were born and raised.”

— which shows us that Mitt is about as funny — and as ethical — as a sub-prime mortgage lender.

And this comes after lying to portray President Obama as an enabler of welfare queens. Next he’ll be telling us that the President do loves him some watermelon.

Pandering to whiteness will get Mittens a lot of votes, unfortunately. Annie Laurie:

A major facet of the GOP’s appeal to working-class white voters, especially white male voters, since Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, has been the unspoken advertisment that voting Republican would set you off as a member of the elite… if not actually rich, or well-educated, or white, or male, at least an aspiring elitist with a clear superiority over the faceless mass of those people (non-whites, immigrants, women, DFHs, welfare queens, moochers & looters). …

… A not inconsiderable portion of the Republican voting population consists of those who would (as Davis X. Machina put it) “volunteer to live, with his family, in a cardboard box under an overpass, and cook sparrows on an old curtain rod, if someone would only guarantee that the black, gay, Hispanic, liberal, whatever, in the next box over doesn’t even have a curtain rod, or a sparrow to put on it.”

Annie Laurie says that much of Mitt’s un-likeability comes from the fact that he’s very bad at faking the winking bonhomie with working class whites that is the bread and butter of Republican politicians these days. And he shows us, over and over, that he’ll stoop to just about anything to appear to be one of the regular (white) guys.

So what if the “birther” bit was a low blow? The crowd loved it!

But the joke’s on them, because to people like Willard Mitt Romney, working-class whites are just employee fodder at the disposal of mine and meat packing plant owners. Or Wal-Mart. Other than that, in the eyes of the wealthy and powerful they are just moochers and takers, expecting their betters (like Romney) to educate their children and provide health care for the old folks. Working-class white is the new black.

God’s Judgment and the GOP

Today Dana Milbank asks if God has forsaken the Republican Party. He cites the representative caught skinny-dipping in the Sea of Galilee, Todd Akin, and reports that a hurricane might wipe out the Tampa convention next week.

“Coincidence?” he asks, tongue somewhat in cheek. “Or part of some Intelligent Design?” Conservatives are awfully quick to pronounce other peoples’ misfortune as God’s Judgment, including the drowning of New Orleans and September 11. Why wouldn’t unfortunate events be God’s wrath against them?

CNN reminds us that “Four years ago Hurricane Gustav brought the first night of the Republican National Convention in land-locked St. Paul, Minnesota to a halt.” I had forgotten that, although as I remember Gustav turned out to be something of a bust. At least the GOP was able to use it to keep George W. Bush from turning up in St. Paul.

Weather Underground says that the odds are Tampa will be hurricane-free next week. Even so, a Category 4 storm could immerse the Tampa Convention Center in 20 feet of water. If that happens, I want trapped conventioneers to have to wait a few days to be rescued, and cops should be stationed around town only to keep desperate people wearing Romney-Ryan buttons from looting, not to actually rescue anyone. It would be justice for New Orleans. I don’t want anyone to be hurt, mind you, just to be taught a lesson.

See also Joan Walsh, “The GOP reaps what it sowed.”

GOP: Blast From the Past

Last night Rachel Maddow explained that the “real rape victims don’t get pregnant” theory for years has been pushed by people who want to criminalize abortions without exception for rape. And that’s absolutely true. That way they can claim that if a woman conceived, she wasn’t really raped, and the exception isn’t necessary.

But when men start to talk about “forcible” rape or “legitimate” rape, I think it speaks to something buried even deeper in their lizard brains. Once upon a time conventional wisdom was that rapists couldn’t be convicted unless the victim was a nun who was killed defending herself. Otherwise, if the woman was wearing a short skirt, had ever been spotted in a bar, was sexually active, or didn’t fight back, it was assumed “she wanted it” and the perpetrator was excused.

One of the successes of the second-wave feminist movement in the 1960s was to shine a light on how unfair that was and get some protections for rape victims written into law. I understand rape charges often are still dismissed by sexist judges sometimes, however.

When men talk about “forcible” or “legitimate” rape, I suspect in their minds “rape” is something that can only happen to virtuous and modestly dressed women who were on their way to church when a total stranger abducted and assaulted them, and they fought back to the point of needing either hospitalization or burial. Otherwise, it wasn’t really a rape. Perhaps such men only relate to rape as a kind of violent physical assault, like a really bad mugging. Women who are slipped a roofie at a frat party and raped while they were unconscious, for example, don’t count, and “date rape” is an oxymoron. They cannot perceive of rape as a violation of one’s personhood, of one’s humanity, as women perceive it. (See Dear Mr. Akin, I Want You to Imagine…)

And I say this is only a few degrees different from the thinking that (1) a virtuous woman must stay covered by a burqua and (2) rape is always the woman’s fault, if she survives. In this view, a woman is merely a multipurpose major appliance whose value is determined by how much she has been used.

Republicans who are busily denouncing Akin today are crafting a convention platform containing a “human life amendment.” This would ban all abortions without explicitly excluding rape and incest victims. They’ve been doing this for the past several conventions, but I don’t know that the general public is aware of it. But now they’re going to hear about it loudly and clearly from the Obama campaign.

The point is that the GOP doesn’t really disagree with what Todd Akin said. They’re just pissed at him that he said it in public.

Republicans are frantically trying to get Representative Todd Akin to drop out of the United States Senate race in Missouri after his remark about abortion and rape, but not because it was offensive and ignorant. They’re afraid he might lose and cost them a chance at a Senate majority next year. He would surely be replaced by a Republican who sounds more reasonable but holds similarly extreme views on abortion, immigration, gay rights and the role of government because those are the kinds of candidates the party nominates these days in state after state.

CNN:

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his running mate Paul Ryan sharply condemned Akin’s remarks and pledged that under a Romney administration, abortion would be allowed in the case of rape.

An exemption for rape, though, is not included in the platform set to be adopted by the party Romney will officially lead when he accepts the Republican nomination next week.

And Ryan, his vice presidential pick, has opposed exceptions for rape and voted alongside Akin in the House, though Ryan now says he defers to Romney’s position on the matter.

Debate over the abortion plank flared four years ago when John McCain, the Republican presidential nominee at the time, said he wanted to add language to the platform to recognize exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother.

That prompted angry finger-wagging from top social conservatives.

Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, chided McCain and said it would be “political suicide” for him to add language about exceptions for rape or incest in the abortion platform.

The Family Research Council has issued a statement of support for Todd Akin.