Jack Smith is about to drop a 180-page brief on Judge Tanya Chutkan in the J6 case, it says here.

“In a new filing, the Special Counsel tells Judge Tanya Chutkan its opening immunity brief will be roughly 180 pages with roughly half devoted to a ‘detailed factual proffer’ and plenty of sensitive material warranting redactions,” the attorney added. “The defense opposes the Special Counsel’s request to file such an oversized brief and has asked to have until Tuesday at 5 pm to submit a written opposition.”

Kyle Cheney, senior legal affairs reporter for Politico, also reported on the upcoming brief, saying, “Jack Smith signals his brief on presidential immunity, due Thursday, will come in at 180 pages.”

Legal analyst Allison Gill, better known as Mueller, She Wrote, added that “Jack Smith asks for permission to exceed the page limit for his immunity brief. It will be 180 pages, and as expected, they intend to file a substantial part of it UNDER SEAL.”

Former prosecutor Barb McQuade said, “Not a surprise that Jack Smith’s brief in immunity case is lengthy. He plans to lay out the mountain of evidence against Trump.”

Marcy Wheeler:

I expect, on top of everything else this week, Trump’s lawyers are going to claim an emergency to try to ban Jack Smith’s book report, currently due Thursday.

As you’ll recall, after Judge Tanya Chutkan finally got the Trump January 6 case back, she agreed with Jack Smith’s proposed path forward: They would submit a brief explaining how the superseding indictment complies with the Supreme Court’s immunity opinion. Chutkan set a deadline of September 26, Thursday, for that brief.

Trump seems certain that if voters see that brief, he will lose the election.

Last Thursday, Trump’s lawyers submitted what was supposed to be a discovery filing, in which they basically said, “NOOOOOOO!!!!! No briefing before the election.” …

…Trump will oppose not just the excess pages, 180 instead of 45, but the entire filing. Now he’s got one less day to make that argument.

Which is what you need to understand the other things in the Jack Smith request. Trump is going to stage an emergency to get this question elevated to SCOTUS to prevent the filing this week. He will try to take things SCOTUS ordered Chutkan to do out of her hands, to put them back before SCOTUS.

Anticipating that, Smith starts his request by laying out that he is just trying to do what Chutkan ordered, to show that SCOTUS ordered precisely this briefing.

Of course, the current SCOTUS doesn’t seem to mind looking corrupt and inconsistent, as long as it helps Trump.

I’m sure you’ll be distressed to know that a lot of things are not working out for Trump these days. For example, the Guardian reports that in August the Harris campaign and DNC raised $257 million in campaign contributions, while Trump and the RNC took in only $85 million. And I believe that’s way down from previous months.

Trump responded by announcing he is selling commemorative silver coins, although it’s not clear profit from the coins will go into his campaign. The coins are $100 each, which is quite a markup for silver.

In another sign of increasing desperation, Trump is now declaring that once he’s re-elected, women will no longer think about abortion. His arguments for why that would be true are not terribly clear, however. Perhaps he intends to make thinking about aboriton illegal. That must be the case, especially since there is new documentation of women getting killed because of the Trump abortion bans.

From 2019 to 2022, the rate of maternal mortality cases in Texas rose by 56%, compared with just 11% nationwide during the same time period, according to an analysis by the Gender Equity Policy Institute. The nonprofit research group scoured publicly available reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and shared the analysis exclusively with NBC News.

This was expected. There is data going back years from many countries showing that criminalizing abortion tends to correlate to higher maternal mortality rates. Maybe Republicans should have thought about that.

Trump also endeared himself to women by calling MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle a “dumb as a rock bimbo” for arguing in favor of Harris on Bill Maher’s show. Ruhel’s opinion so disturbed Trump he issued a long tirade on Truth Social in which he insulted Ruhle, Maher, Bret Stephens (also on the show), “MSDNC,” and the New York Times. I think we can say that Trump is not exactly a roll-with-the punches guy. That man’s head is going to explode any day now.

You’ve probably heard that Kamala Harris accepted an invitation from CNN for an October debate. Trump has declared it’s “too late” to debate. He may change his mind if his numbers continue to slide. Both candidates are also talking to “Sixty Minutes” about interviews.

Mark Robinson did not drop out of the gubernatorial race in North Carolina. He blew past the deadline for dropping out and will be the GOP candidate until the bitter end. Several news stories say that Trump is trying to ignore the mess. But Trump has a rally scheduled in North Carolina tomorrow. Robinson will not be there, but if any of the press can get close to Trump they’ll no doubt ask Trump to comment on Robinson. And Trump will no doubt say he barely knows the guy. Meanwhile, the Harris-Walz campaign is said to be preparing television ads tying Robinson to Trump. None are online yet, but I bet they will contain some of the same news bits as this CNN report:

Update: Here’s the ad, just made available.

In other salacious news, see New Court Filings Place Matt Gaetz at a Party at the Center of the Sex Trafficking Scandal. And with a teenage girl. Unfortunately, according to the one poll I could find, Gaetz is currently 47 points ahead of his Democratic opponent for his House seat. As long as that’s the case I doubt he’ll be pressured to drop out.

Yesterday, as the Robinson bombshell was all over the news, Stable Genius Trump addressed Jewish audiences about rising antisemitism in the United States. He brilliantly made his point by adding to the rising antisemitism. According to The Forward,

In a speech Thursday billed as former President Donald Trump’s answer to rising antisemitism, he said Jews would bear much of the responsibility if he loses the presidential election.

And in a second speech later in the evening, to the Israeli American Council, Trump elaborated on his past assertions in recent weeks that Israel would not survive if he doesn’t win in November, by painting a doomsday scenario in which Iran launches nuclear weapons and invoking the Holocaust. 

“The Jewish people would have a lot to do with a loss,” Trump said during the first speech of the evening, an hourlong address at an event called “Fighting Antisemitism in America,” organized with GOP megadonor Miriam Adelson, at the Hyatt Regency hotel on Capitol Hill.

“You can’t let this happen,” he told his largely Jewish audience. 

Trump in recent weeks has offended many Jews by questioning their mental health for voting for Democrats — as most Jews do — and predicting Israel’s demise should Harris win. But Thursday night’s comments seem to represent an escalation in Trump’s rhetoric, in that he singled out Jewish Americans — who represent only about 2% of the electorate — as a significant reason he might lose the election, one whose results he has never pledged to accept. 

Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said after the speech that Trump’s remarks endanger Jews. …

… Trump often talks about his support for Israel in transactional terms, suggesting Israelis owe him loyalty in return. Many Israelis appreciate how, in his first term, Trump relocated the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, recognized Israel’s control over the Golan Heights, withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and brokered the Abraham Accords. 

And while his complaints about American Jews voting for Democrats have grown common in recent weeks, the theme is not new. After the 2020 presidential election, in which 77% of Jewish voters chose President Joe Biden, Trump accused them of ingratitude.

In these and other remarks Trump consistently conflates all Jews with Israelis, and assumes that American Jews owe their first loyalty to Israel, not the U.S. See also Rolling Stone. Once again, Trump’s utter lack of self-awareness is stunning.

And speaking of bigotry, the very Republican governor of Ohio, Mike DeWine, has an op ed in the New York Times defending the Hatians of Springfield and (more in sorrow than anger) calling out Trump and Vance for spreading vicious lies about them.

What’s Up with the Teamsters?

What’s really pissed me off today are the Teamsters. There’s something seriously out of kilter with its leadership. See especially The Gigantic Failure That Led to the Teamsters’ Decision Not to Endorse Harris or Trump by Steven Greenhouse at Slate. Do read this. Open in an incognito window if you hit a paywall. The difference between Trump and Harris on unions is massive. There’s no excuse for this.

The Teamsters say that the decision was based on an “internal survey” of members. What they didn’t tell you was that this “survey” was not an actual polling of members but taken from responses to a survey printed on the back of a Teamster magazine. Steven Greenhouse continues,

But to my mind, that internal survey showing so many Teamsters backing Trump highlighted something else: The union’s leadership must have done a dreadful job informing and educating rank-and-file members about how hugely anti-union Trump is and how aggressively anti-union and anti-worker Trump’s first administration was (and appointees were). Also, Teamster leaders evidently also failed to explain to rank-and-file members that Harris has fought for policy after policy strongly backed by the Teamsters and other unions, including the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which is the labor movement’s No. 1 legislative priority and would make it considerably easier for the Teamsters and other unions to organize. Trump opposes the PRO Act. Harris also supported the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, the CHIPS Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act, which together will create hundreds of thousands of good-paying union jobs for Teamsters and other union members. Harris, unlike Trump, also supports increasing the pathetically low $7.25-an-hour federal minimum wage to at least $15.

This could be the real reason:

Many Teamsters remain angry at Biden for signing legislation in December 2022 that blocked a threatened nationwide rail strike. The Teamsters board seemed to be making this a litmus test, wanting Harris and Trump to pledge not to block a national rail strike even though presidents and Congress are specifically empowered to do so under the Railway Labor Act.

The problem was that a prolonged rail strike at the time would have devastated the fragile economy, in particular the Biden Administration’s work to lower inflation without triggering a recession.

Update: See Timothy Noah, The Teamsters President Is Out of His Depth.

In Other News

MAGA Republicans Pass New Election Rules in Georgia That Could Rig the State for Trump

Digby, Will This Election End Up Before The Supreme Court?

House Republicans work to defuse Trump as they defy shutdown demands

The alleged second Trump assasination attempter, Ryan Routh, appears to be a vocational flake. Multiple news organizations have checked him out. He has no affiliations with any political activist group, left or right. He was a Trump supporter in 2016 but changed his mind at some point.

He did spend time in Ukraine, where he claimed to be recruiting foreign soldiers to fight against the Russian invasion. He also claimed to have somehow obtained a lot of drones for the cause. But it appears he mostly just hung out near the Kyiv hotel where most of the journalists stayed and occasionally got himself interviewed. The Ukrainians made him out to be a crank with several loose screws and wouldn’t work with him. In truth he recruited nobody and apparently obtained nothing.

What’s more interesting to me is this story in Public Notice by Lisa Needham. Although by all appearances Routh intended to shoot someone on the golf course — presumably Donald Trump — all he’s been charged with are weapons charges. And it’s probably the case that’s about all the law can hang on him. And even that is mostly because he has a prior felony conviction and is not supposed to possess firearms. If he’d been a genuine “law-abiding citizen,” he’d be down to one count, of possessing a firearm with a scraped-off serial number.

Under Gov. Ron DeSantis, Florida got rid of even the most meager safety requirements, such as requiring a permit or undergoing training and a background check. Sure, it’s still against the law for a person with a felony conviction to have a gun, but what guardrails are left to stop him from getting one or two or a dozen? 

None of this is stopping DeSantis from demanding that Florida take the investigation away from the federal government, not just because he’s sure the Deep State will bury the truth or whatever, but also so that Routh could be charged under state law with attempted murder and potentially serve life in prison. Good luck, buddy. Routh didn’t get a shot off and was roughly 300-500 yards from Trump when he was spotted. He wasn’t even trespassing, as he was on the public side of the golf course fence. 

To get to life in prison, Florida would have to charge Routh with attempted first-degree felony murder and prove that he was attempting to kill Trump in the course of committing a different underlying crime like arson, burglary, or carjacking. DeSantis thinks he’ll get there by exploring “red flags” about Routh’s “associations, his motivations, and his ideology,” but even if Routh was a card-carrying Marxist who had been volunteering for the Harris campaign for months, it doesn’t make his behavior attempted murder. 

Regarding the scraped-off serial number, Needham points out that “In 2022, a federal judge in West Virginia concluded that since there were no serial numbers at the time of the Founding Fathers, it’s unconstitutional to ban people from obliterating serial numbers or possessing a gun with an obliterated serial number.” That decision was reversed, but with dissents.  One of the dissenters was a Trump appointee.

And this is what happens when gun laws are written by a crazy gun-worshiping cult. If Routh made no declarations that he intended to kill Trump that day, he could argue in court he was just on the lookout for alligators, or something. As far as Routh’s “red flags” are concerned, they seem to say that like Trump himself, Routh is mentally miswired and obsessed with seeking glory. According to several news stories he was smiling and laughing during his arraignment, and why not? He was finally getting what he wanted — attention.

And I’m certainly not saying the law should let Routh go. He’s not a stable person. If it could be guaranteed he wouldn’t have access to guns he might be harmless enough, but this is America. Anyone can always get a firearm, somehow. But he’s probably not psychotic, just flakey. So I’m not sure he could be committed to a mental hospital under present law. I don’t know what anyone’s going to do with him.

Routh sounds a bit like Charles J. Guiteau, who assassinated President James Garfield in 1881. Guiteau was an obscure man who had supported Garfield in the 1880 election. He published and distributed a badly written essay about Garfield to help him get elected, and then when Garfield won Guiteau became obsessed with the belief that Garfield owed him. He spent some time loitering near the White House, accosting State Department officials on the streets, demanding to be assigned to the consul in Vienna or Paris. And eventually he got tired of waiting and decided God wanted him to shoot Garfield, and he did. Flakes with guns can be dangerous.

My representative in the U.S. House is a Republican named Mike Lawler. By current GOP standards Lawler probably qualifies as a “centrist,” meaning he doesn’t support stealing bread from homeless orphans, but it’s hard to tell. Whatever. I’ll be voting for his Dem opponent, Mondaire Jones. The Dems seem to think this is a flippable seat. A lot of money is going into the campaigns.

Mike Lawler suddenly has a Hatian problem. Politico reports,

New York Rep. Marc Molinaro last week gave oxygen to the debunked rumor that Haitian newcomers to Springfield, Ohio, abduct and eat cats and dogs — posting it to X, Instagram and Facebook as one of a multitude of attacks meant to challenge his Democratic rival’s commitment to border security.

Two congressional districts to the south, Rep. Mike Lawler, whose constituency includes a sizable Haitian American population, released a statement urging his fellow Republicans to refrain from circulating unsubstantiated rumors. It was attributed to a spokesperson and blamed no one by name.

Lawler is trying his best to signal the Haitian community that he’s not on board with the hate on Haitians being pushed by other Republicans. But he’s trying to do this without calling out other Republicans. Mondaire Jones has no such restraints, of course, and I understand he is running with the issue. It might make a difference in the election.

And I’m wondering if the extremism coming from Trump and Vance might impact other House races in “purple” districts. Trump and Vance are getting more disgusting by the minute.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Vance knew good and well there was no pet-eating going on in Springfield before he started pushing the story. From Rolling Stone:

According to a Wednesday report from The Wall Street Journal, on Sept. 9 — the day Vance first posted on X claiming local cats were being eaten by Springfield’s Haitians — most of which are in the town legally — his office called local authorities to verify the claim. 

A Vance staffer “asked point-blank, ‘Are the rumors true of pets being taken and eaten [true]?’” City Manager Bryan Heck told the Journal. “I told him no. There was no verifiable evidence or reports to show this was true. I told them these claims were baseless.” 

The subtext, I suspect, is that the people in charge at the Wall Street Journal realize the Springfield-Haitian flap is hurting Republicans more than helping and are trying to tamp it down before it does any more damage.  If they have to throw Vance under the bus, so be it. Nobody likes Vance.

Of course, House Republicans don’t need much help at being their own worst enemies. Some time today the House is supposed to vote on a government funding bill to avoid a partial shutdown starting October 1. “Johnson’s proposed bill combines a six-month stopgap funding measure, known as a continuing resolution, with the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (Save) Act, a controversial proposal that would require people to show proof of citizenship when they register to vote,” says the Guardian. This is on orders from Trump, of course.

This same bill was pulled last week because Johnson realized he didn’t have the votes. Even some of his colleagues are surprised he’s pushing the same bill now.  Oddly, to me anyway, it’s the Crazy Causes that opposes the bill to be voted on today. I take it it’s not crazy enough.

The Senate has already made it known it will not pass the spending bill with the voter measure included. So even if it passes in the House — and it probably won’t — it’s dead in the Senate. And Mitch McConnell is calling out the House maneuver as beyond stupid. Congress should not be risking a shutdown that will be blamed on Republicans right before an election, says Mitch.

If the poison pill spending bill fails to pass in the House, the sensible thing to do would be for the House to quickly pass a “clean” bill that isn’t too crazy so that the Senate will pass it to avoid the shutdown. I don’t think either party wants a shutdown drama right now. But whether the House Crazy Caucus will let Mike Johnson get away with that is a big question. Marjorie Taylor Greene is already on the warpath about a possible “bait and switch.”

“Johnson is leading a fake fight that he has no intention of actually fighting,” Greene said Tuesday on X. “I refuse to lie to anyone that this plan will work and it’s already [dead on arrival] this week. Speaker Johnson needs to go to the Democrats, who he has worked with the entire time, to get the votes he needs to do what he is already planning to do.”

Donald Trump, who has championed baseless claims of widespread non-citizen voting, has increased the pressure on Johnson by insisting that the House should only approve a government funding bill if it is linked to “election security” measures.

“If Republicans in the House, and Senate, don’t get absolute assurances on Election Security, THEY SHOULD, IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, GO FORWARD WITH A CONTINUING RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET,” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social, last week.

Trump does not care if this costs Republicans the Senate and House. He’s just thinking about himself.

[Update: The bill failed in the House. All but three Dems and 14 Republicans voted no. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie voted present. I’m still looking for the identity of the three Dems who voted yes.]

Dana Milbank:

In the first 18 months of this Congress, only 70 laws were enacted. Calculations by political scientist Tobin Grant, who tracks congressional output over time, put this Congress on course to be the do-nothingest since 1859-1861 — when the Union was dissolving. But Johnson’s House isn’t merely unproductive; it is positively lunatic. Republicans have filled their committee hearings and their bills with white nationalist attacks on racial diversity and immigrants, attempts to ban abortion and to expand access to the sort of guns used in mass shootings, incessant harassment of LGBTQ Americans, and even routine potshots at the U.S. military. They insulted each other’s private parts, accused each other of sexual and financial crimes, and scuffled with each other in the Capitol basement. They screamed “Bullshit!” at President Joe Biden during the State of the Union address. They stood up for the Confederacy and used their official powers to spread conspiracy theories about the “Deep State.” Some even lent credence to the idea that there has been a century-old Deep State coverup of space aliens, with possible involvement by Mussolini and the Vatican.

I understand the ancient Roman Senate was fairly wacky in its later days, also. This is not encouraging.

The latest updates:

There are indications that Kamala Harris is getting some decent post-debate bounce. It’s still closer than it would be in a sane world.

J.D. Vance explained Trump’s concept of a plan for health care. Per Jonathan Chait:

Vance explained the Trump plan during an interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker: “He, of course, does have a plan for how to fix American health care, but a lot of it goes down, Kristen, to deregulating insurance markets, so that people can actually choose a plan that makes sense for them.”

Vance is advocating a partial or complete return to the system that existed before Obamacare. In that world, prior to 2014, it was very difficult to find affordable coverage unless you were on Medicare, Medicaid, or got insurance through your employer. There was a market for individual insurance, and it was possible to buy plans if you didn’t get coverage through a government plan or through work. But that market was dominated by “adverse selection” — the only way insurers could make money was to weed out any customers likely to need medical care.

Was Vance asleep from 2008 to 2010 when the details of the Affordable Care Act were being fought over? And back when millions of people couldn’t get health insurance at any price? Unreal.

There have been 33 separate bomb threats made against schools in Springfield, said Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine. Several of them came from “overseas,” from one country in particular, but DeWine would not say which country. No actual bombs were found, but of course they have to be taken seriously nonetheless.

Nativist hysteria is hardly new to the U.S., of course. There was another incident when false rumors about immigrants set off several days of rioting, resulting in about 20 deaths and two churches and a seminary burned. The year was 1844, the city was Philadelphia, and the immigrants were Irish.

It turns out that Trump’s Arlington Cemetery incident is being investigated, but not by the Army.

Law enforcement officials at a Virginia military base are still actively investigating an August incident at Arlington National Cemetery involving what has been described as a confrontation between former President Donald Trump’s campaign and a cemetery worker, even as the Army says it considers the matter closed, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

As part of the probe led by the Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Police Department, an investigator with the base’s police department has sought in recent days to contact Trump campaign officials about the incident, the sources said.

Investigators are seeking to interview the officials involved in the incident, according to the sources.

Pro Publica reports that Judge Aileen Cannon Failed to Disclose a Right-Wing Junket. And that wasn’t the first time.

Today Republicans in the Senate again blocked a bill that would have protected IVF.

They’re more afraid of the Fetus people than they are of being consistent.

Late last week several hard-right websites were promising that a WHISTLEBLOWER was about to come forward and explain how ABC rigged the debate for Harris, allegedly by giving her the questions in advance. But then yesterday Marjorie Taylor Greene x’ed that this whistleblower was killed in a car crash. So disappointing. Never fear, though; Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit is calling the car crash report a HOAX. This whistleblower will appear! Any minute now! Just you wait! And you can read more about it at the Gateway Pundit site, to which I do not link, if you want to.

And if he doesn’t appear, I’m willing to bet the car crash will be blamed on a Haitian migrant.

In other news — you probably heard about the guy who appears to have planned to shoot Trump while the former president was playing golf at his West Palm Beach golf club. By all reports so far this guy was a “lone wolf” gunman, not part of any organization. He just doesn’t like Trump. Trump, of course, is blaming Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Elon Musk also showed the world who he is:

Following a second assassination attempt on Donald Trump Sunday, Musk issued an alarming tweet questioning why the MAGA conservative had been targeted several times while there had been no such attempt to attack Vice President Kamala Harris.

“And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/Kamala,” Musk wrote.

Musk deleted the tweet after it received widespread backlash, with X users torching him for “inciting violence.”

By Monday, Musk had issued a couple of new tweets to explain away the atrocious comment. Apparently, he considered the violent invitation just a bad retelling of a “hilarious” joke.

I would think he has lawyers on retainer who would have told him to take the tweet down. The word “moron” does come to mind.

An hour after trying to brush off his own poor remarks, Musk shared a video that claimed to depict Democrats “calling for” political violence, including snippets of Nancy Pelosi referring to the 2020 fake electors as “enemies of the state” for undermining the last presidential election, as well as a clip of actor Robert de Niro sharing that he’d like to punch Trump “in the face.”

On a serious note, ProPublica is reporting that at least two women in Georgia have died because they were unable to get abortions that could have saved them.

I’m learning from TPM that two hospitals in Springfield, Ohio, were locked down after receiving bomb threats. We’ll be very if lucky nobody is killed because of this nativist nonsense. Trump, of course, is refusing to denounce the bomb threats.

Here’s a recent story from the New York Times that should have gotten more attention. See How Roberts Shaped Trump’s Supreme Court Winning Streak by Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak (no paywall). The Times obtained a leaked memo by Roberts in which he insisted the Court rule on the presidential immunity case and suggested strongly that the lower courts were all wrong in their understanding of separation of powers. Robert also was much much behind the Court’s opinions related to J6 insurrectionists and whether states can unilaterally drop a federal candidate from the ballot.

Here are a couple of photos of Trump and Laura Loomer that I understand were taken this week.

I pulled these from a Times of India article. Executive summary: Wink, nudge.

Marcy Wheeler writes that the Laura Loomer problem is the same as the Vladimir Putin problem.  Which is, basically, that Trump is so addled and so emotionally needy that he’s easier to manipulate than silly putty. It’s said people within Trump World are worried that Loomer has way too much influence over Trump at the moment. And that’s as much as I want to know.

The hysteria over Springfield, Ohio, continues. Schools and city administrative offices have had to be evacuated because of bomb threats. The mayor of springfield and governor of Ohio have both said there is no pet-eating going on. By all local accounts the Haitian community of Springfield has contributed a great deal. John Legend, a native of Springfield, issued this video:

Meanwhile, Donald Jr. said this:

Donald Trump Jr. suggested on Thursday that Haitian immigrants were less intelligent than people from other countries, and claimed that there was demographic evidence to back this up. He provided none.

“You look at Haiti, you look at the demographic makeup, you look at the average I.Q. — if you import the third world into your country, you’re going to become the third world,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with Charlie Kirk on Real America’s Voice, a conservative broadcasting network. “That’s just basic. It’s not racist. It’s just fact.”

I wonder how people in Ohio, not just Springfield, are dealing with this. We’re going to be lucky if no one is killed.

Reports at TPM and the Guardian say that the Haitians of Springfield were initially target by a Neo-Nazi group called Blood Tribe. J.D. Vance picked up the pet consumption rumors from the Nazis, and from there it spread to the Trump campaign. Let’s hope there’s a backlash.

Russell Moore, editor in chief of Christianity Today, tries to remind people that spreading false witness against anybody is sorta kinda not what Jesus would do. Moore, bless his heart, is a man who takes Christianity seriously. He must be very lonely.

We’ve got more than 50 more days of this? Help …

Let’s be careful out there …

The political world is still processing Tuesday night’s debate. I understand the Harris campaign is putting out television ads featuring debate highlights. And not everyone on the Right is closing ranks around Trump. Some long-time GOP operatives — Frank Luntz and Karl Rove, for example — gave frankly accurate assessments that Trump got owned. Not that many people listen to Karl Rove any more.

My sense of things is that the effects of Tuesday night are still in play. Although Trump’s obviously impaired mental state still is not being as openly discussed as it ought to be, it is being discussed even in mainstream media outlets. I predict from here on Trump’s verbal disconnects from reality will not be so utterly “sanewashed” except in right-wing media. His mental state will finally become part of the narrative. No more ignoring the obvious out of some misguided sense of “fairness.” Let’s hope, anyway.

See also Philip Bump at WaPo, Donald Trump no longer knows how to talk to anyone outside his base. He’s so insulated and isolated inside his own MAGA-world he can’t function outside of it.

Programming note: The debate between Walz and Vance will be Tuesday, October 1. Given that it’s unlikely Trump would be able to fake his way through another presidential term, people who are still undecided really need to take a closer look at Vance.

One related story I haven’t been watching as much as I should have involves House Republicans. Nicole Lafond, Talking Points Memo:

Donald Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson are very proud of their plan to link a must-pass piece of government funding legislation to a bill that lays the groundwork for Trump to blame undocumented immigrants for his potential defeat in November. The only problem, we’re now learning, is that no one of any influence is on board with this plan besides the two of them.

Johnson hatched the plan at the beginning of the month, caving to pressure from members of the House Freedom Caucus (the Trumpy tail wagging House-Republican-conference dog) to attach the SAVE Act to any funding bills the House passes to keep the government open. The Act would outlaw non-citizen voting in federal elections, which is already illegal and statistically rarely happens, and require proof of citizenship in order to register to vote; experts say it is both unnecessary and would suppress the vote. For this reason, the bill could not pass the Democratic-controlled Senate, and so would risk a government shutdown.

The bill isn’t completely dead in the House, but Johnson apparently doesn’t have the votes. I take it one big impediment is that there are House Republicans with enough sense to realize they don’t want a government shutdown right before the election, which would be blamed on them, which is what would happen if a spending bill isn’t passed. They aren’t all taking orders from Trump, apparently.

And then after Trump absurdly called himself “the leader on fertilization,” in reference to IVF, Chuck Schumer is cornering Senate Republicans by introducing an IVF protection bill very similar to one they’ve already rejected. Repubicans can’t support IVF without angering the Fetus People, you know.

See also:

And we’ve had a request for the dancing banana …

I had a lot of fun this morning cruising around the Web and reading the reviews. Even right-wing sites admitted it was not a good night for Trump, although most blamed the moderators for being biased. (At least one also blamed Laura Loomer.) I’m sure most folks who didn’t watch are hearing that Trump bombed.

And then there’s this. I didn’t know Drudge was still online, but I guess he is.

CNN supports ABC:

CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale appeared on TV screens soon after the Trump-Harris debate ended Tuesday night to give his preliminary verdict—and declared that Donald Trump had lied at least 33 times during the 90-minute face-off.

“This was a staggeringly dishonest debate performance from former President Trump,” Dale told host Jake Tapper. “Just lie after lie on subject after subject. By my preliminary count, Jake, Trump made at least 33 false claims. Thirty-three!

“By contrast, by—again—a preliminary count, Vice President Harris made at least one false claim, though she added at least a few misleading claims and a few more that lacked key context.”

Dale, who has been fact-checking Trump for years, explained that the former president’s firehose of untruths was totally unprecedented in American political history.

“I think a lot of Americans say, ‘Well, all politicians lie,’” he said. “No major presidential candidate before Donald Trump has ever lied with this kind of frequency. A remarkably large chunk of what he said tonight was just not true.”

There’s a big difference between putting a spin on data by leaving out some context, which all politicians do, and quite another to say things happened that didn’t happen, like aliens eating people’s pets in Springfield, Ohio. The claim about some states allowing an infanticide option for mothers who don’t want their babies was never true, either, even though Fetus People have been claiming that for years. (I understand it originated from the common medical practice of giving only palliative care to newborns with such severe birth defects they have absolutely no hope of survival for more than a few hours, a concept the Fetus People can’t seem to grasp.)

Trump’s other mistake is that he’s been telling his followers for weeks now that Kamala Harris isn’t very bright and wasn’t giving interviews because she can’t speak well in public. It must have been disorienting to watch this allegedly dimwitted woman mopping the floor with God Emperor Trump. But Kamala Harris probably is used to being underestimated.

Along those lines, see Jonathan Last at The Bulwark, What More Do You People Want from Kamala Harris?

Harris delivered the goods. You never know if a politician can play on the national stage until they do it. Sometimes a promising candidate pops. Sometimes they’re Ron DeSantis.

At every turn over the last seven weeks, Harris popped. From her first speech at the campaign HQ in Delaware, to the first big rally, to her convention speech, to the debate—she answered the bell every time.

She is not coasting. She is not simply existing as a non-octogenarian alternative to Trump. She is waging a smart, vigorous campaign and executing at a high level.

Even this morning I’m still seeing interviews with undecided voters who complain they don’t know where Harris stands on issues. This is something that’s been driving me bats for decades now. Ultimately it doesn’t matter how much information about  candidates’ stands on issues is readily available (see Harris’s issues page on her campaign website, for example). There will be some who will persistently refuse to understand how a candidate they don’t want to vote for stands on issues. Just ignore these people, I say.

Jonathan Last also said this:

Some conservatives seem to think that news networks exist to serve the interests of their preferred candidates. That is a misunderstanding.

A journalistic institution exists to serve its audience by giving them the clearest possible understanding of reality.1 The first duty of a journalistic institution is not to be “fair” to the politicians it covers. It is to make certain that its audience is presented an accurate view of reality.

The footnote says, “An institution which places consideration for politicians above the interests of its audience practices something other than journalism.”

Even so, Trump was allowed to talk a lot more than Harris.

KAMALA HARRIS
Spoke for: 37.1 minutes
Amount of times she spoke: 23
DONALD TRUMP
Spoke for: 41.9 minutes
Amount of times he spoke: 39

— Stephanie Ruhle (@SRuhle) September 11, 2024

So who’s unfair? Anyway, there are so many good analyses of How Trump Screwed the Pooch Last Night to even begin to link to them all. Do see Steve M and David Kurtz for starts, though.

(I plan to watch and post comments through the debate, although I planned to do that last time and flaked out. Wish everybody luck. I am making no predictions. Consider this an open thread to talk about whatever.)

I’m here. Fingers crossed. Here we go.

Did she just bait him to bring up tariffs?

It’s painful to me to hear him talk. But I think she’s pretty good so far.

I had to mute Trump. I’m just watching Harris’s face now.

I’m still muting Donald Trump. He looks like he’s getting worked up, though.

OMG, she’s saying people leave his rallies early. He can’t stand that.

They’re eating the dogs!

She’s laughing at him.

He’s going to have sparks flying out of his head in a minute.

She’s definitely got him rattled. Whether low-information voters can tell when he’s lying I cannot say.

She’s on offense; he’s on defense.

Well,  she seems to be doing well to me.

Um, isn’t this thing about over? It was suppossed to be 90 minutes.

Josh Marshall:

 In any war, in any sport, you maintain the initiative and you’re on the road to victory. Harris has controlled the entire debate. She’s effectively baited him in a way no other candidate has ever been able to do. It’s not like she’s going to rocket into some big lead. People aren’t going to abandon Trump. But she needed to show she can dominate him, be the one in control. She has. It’s as simple as that. She’s also gotten him to spend most of the debate showing his most feral and angry self. This debate was a rout. I don’t think there’s any other way to put it.

Just on a presentation note, it struck me that Trump, with his inch-deep greasepaint on his face, looked “blacker” than Harris.

Okay, I feel better now. I think Harris did what she set out to do. She completely controlled the debate. He looked weak and angry and afraid. I wonder how many people watched?