I bailed on the veep debate, thinking it was going better for Vance than for Walz. Today the general consensus appears to be that the debate was either a Vance win or a draw, but I take it Walz did land a few punches. See Josh Marshall’s debate wrap-up for an “it was a draw” argument.
If we still have a country when this election is over, somebody needs to sit down with the networks and permanently nix the “no fact checking” provision. If a candidate refuses to participate if there will be fact checking, turn the debate into a prime time interview with the other candidate. And the candidate who refused to debate gets no equal time. Or maybe Democrats should refuse to paraticipate if there will be no fact checking. This is ridiculous. “No fact checking” gives too much of an advantage to liars.
Here’s some better news: “The Cook Political Report on Tuesday shifted Texas’s Senate race from “likely Republican” to “lean Republican,” signaling momentum for Rep. Colin Allred’s (D) challenge against incumbent Sen. Ted Cruz (R) in the red state.” Fingers crossed.
Perhaps the larger news story from yesterday is that Trump gave a news conference in Milwaukee yesterday in which he was so out of it that even the Washington Post noticed.
He spoke of “a million Rambos.” “Turnarounds” and “gotaways” and “dead-head spending.” He mixed up Iran with North Korea and strained to pronounce United Arab Emirates. He marveled at Hurricane Helene coming so late in the storm season, which typically runs through November. He falsely claimed government agencies can’t name the U.S. population, and he compared the conflict between Israel and Iran to “two kids fighting in the schoolyard.” …
… Trump spoke slowly and appeared tired. It was his second stop of the day, and he has picked up the pace of campaigning in recent weeks. …
… Trump was more energetic during a speech to supporters in Waunakee, Wis., earlier Tuesday. He went on an extended riff about the 1987 film “Full Metal Jacket” and made up a false claim that Harris raised taxes as the San Francisco district attorney, which is not a power of that office.
See also Aaron Rupar’s Public Notice substack.
Apparently the event in Milwaukee was originally supposed to be a rally, and tickets were distributed. But when ticket holders showed up they were not allowed in; just media. I don’t know what’s up with that.
It was just a couple of weeks ago that Bill Scher at Washington Monthly was writing about Trump’s laziest campaign. Apparently he’s been picking up the pace in response to the poll numbers. I know I wouldn’t have the stamina to maintain a presidential campaign schedule without falling apart, but I’m not running for president. Trump is. I wonder if he’ll make it to election day.
Stop the presses, folks.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/02/politics/jack-smith-donald-trump-filing/index.html
Things have gotten to the point in Trump's mental deterioration it seems that it strains the reporters writing skill to convey what is happening. Trumps lack of understanding of the social situation he is in and his ability to even read a script appears gone at least at times. His ad libs defy sanewashing more frequently, and he never self corrects erroneous names or facts spontaneously.
One has to assume he is quite dependent on his aides and handlers, and one wonders what he can do independently. He went to the flood areas, but his recollections seem but a jumble of misunderstandings. He desperately needs an assessment of his mental competency including brain functioning and psychopathology. He does not see it, and no one close to him is allowed to see or admit to the need either. That means it probably won't happen.
Now it is a question is how big the collateral damage will be and how to avoid it. He seems to be definitely getting more unstable. So too those around him.
What I have read of Jack Smith's report shows Trump failed to adapt to his 2020 election loss. Many capable and powerful people tried to get that reality across to him to no avail. Now, years later, many other realities are also getting mentally rejected. So many he can't keep his lies straight anymore. He just utters more and more nonsense. Darker and darker nonsense.
One thing about the debate: I've seen a lot of people saying that "Geez, Vance sure lied his ass off." That matters more than "winning" the debate.
Vance was *smooth*, okay? He was *unctuous*, I'll grant. But to me, it seemed like he was telling people "you say you disagree, let me lie why you agree." And that is obnoxious to me. I guess if you see him defending "your" position, you might be okay, but, I find it even more obnoxious on my nominal side – we're supposed to be better than that!
I'm hopeful.