Resist the Surge

What Steve Gilliard says.

[Update] Wes Clark has an op ed in today’s Washington Post that’s worth a read.

The odds are that this week President Bush will announce a “surge” of up to 20,000 additional U.S. troops into Iraq. Will this deliver a “win”? Probably not. But it will distract us from facing the deep-seated regional issues that must be resolved….

… What the surge would do is put more American troops in harm’s way, further undercut the morale of U.S. forces and risk further alienating elements of the Iraqi populace. American casualties would probably rise, at least temporarily, as more troops appeared on the streets — as happened in the summer when a brigade from Alaska was extended and sent into Baghdad. And even if the increased troop presence initially frustrated the militias, it wouldn’t be long before they found ways to work around the neighborhood searches and other obstacles, if they chose to continue the conflict.

Other uses for troops include accelerating training of the Iraqi military and police. But vetting these Iraqi forces for loyalty has proved problematic. So neither accelerated training nor adding Iraqi troops to the security mission can be viewed as though a specified increase in effort would yield an identical increase in return.

The truth is that the underlying problems are political, not military.

Vicious ethnic cleansing is underway, as various factions fight for power and survival. In this environment, security is unlikely to come from smothering the struggle with a blanket of forces — and increasing U.S. efforts is likely to generate additional resistance, especially from Iraq’s neighbors. More effective action is needed to resolve the struggle at the political level. A new U.S. ambassador might help, but the administration needs to recognize that the neoconservative vision has failed.

[Update update] Paul Krugman on the surge:

[W]hat’s clear is the enormous price our nation is paying for President Bush’s character flaws.

One thought on “Resist the Surge

  1. The link to sign the MoveOn petition to Resist the Surge is here:

    http://pol.moveon.org/noescalation/

    Though the following also ties in to your “Nice Planet” post,
    Wes Clark has been particularly activated about the plans to bomb Iran that are being buried under the “surge” issue.

    “How can you talk about bombing a country when you won’t even talk to them?” said Clark. “It’s outrageous. We’re the United States of America; we don’t do that”.

    This conversation with Arianna Huffington last week was mused upon at :
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20070104/cm_huffpost/037837

    in response to this UPI editorial that is well worth the read: http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20070102-125318-7565r

    My understanding of the Israeli mindset is quite limited, but what is becoming increasingly clear is that we are going to pay ever increasing costs for W’s mental illness.

    I cannot for the life of me understand how the Israelis think they are going to be more secure if a policy of aerial excavation is adopted.

Comments are closed.