The Washington Post just announced that Ben Domenech has resigned from his WaPo blog. This is not a surprise.
Whether I agree with his opinions or not, I would expect someone who landed such a plum assignment at the tender age of 24 to show a spark of cleverness, some freshness, some, um, talent. But Mr. Domenech’s work at WaPo was drearily unexceptional and, to this middle-age lady, about as interesting as a sixth-grader’s Social Studies report on wheat farming in Saskatchewan.
His strongest post was this one, in which he takes offense because WaPo editors didn’t “get” current rightie film iconography. This is writing typical of a college newspaper, but I think WaPo could do better. Even choosing among rightie bloggers, WaPo could do better.
Speaking of college newspapers, I’ve looked at the examples (at Salon, Eschaton, and elsewhere) and the boy did plagiarize other peoples’ work for his college newspaper, The Flat Hat. To plagiarize is “To use and pass off (the ideas or writings of another) as one’s own,” according to the online American Heritage dictionary. And he did that; it is beyond question. There is a post up at RedState.com titled “We Must Defend” that defends Mr. Domenech, thus: “…permissions obtained and judgments made offline were not reflected online by an out dated and out of business campus newspaper.” But even if he had obtained permission to quote other peoples’ work, he still plagiarized that work by trying to pass it off as his own. And, strictly speaking, it would be a violation of any one-time serial rights agreement I’ve ever seen to republish the permissioned work without the proper permissions statements attached to it. And The Flat Hat (linked above) is not out of business. So the “defense” is absurd on its face.
(And what’s really outrageous for anyone who cares about film, he plagiarized bleeping Stephanie Zacharek of Salon. Zacharek’s “Batman Begins” review actually says the Joel Schumacher Batman films were better. There’s no excuse for that.)
I’m assuming Mr. Domenech got the Post position through connections, as it wasn’t through talent. DHinMI writes,
Ben Domenech did not get his position at the Washington Post based on merit. He got his position because of connections. He was home-schooled in part because his family–unlike most American families–could maintain a comfortable living with only one parent working outside the home. He got in to William and Mary, but he did not come close to graduating. (And given his penchant for plagiarism, one would have to wonder if intellectual thievery prompted a forced departure from William and Mary.) Nevertheless, despite no degree or significant life accomplishments, he got some patronage jobs in the Bush administration, no doubt because his father is an upper level GOP apparatchik. He has gotten bylines over at that bastion of heartless blue bloods, the National Review Online. He was a founder of Redstate.com. (And can you believe those clowns have shut down comments from new members, banned anyone who criticizes Domenech, and are actively defending this thief?) And he parlayed all those connections in to getting the Washington Post gig while still in his mid-20’s.
Would anyone recognize a similar career trajectory of some schmoe from a working class community outside the DC/NYC/Boston/LA/Bay Area metro areas, who went to a state university, got great grades, but whose blue collar parents didn’t have the connections of a Ben Domenech? Especially within the context of the current GOP, somebody with that background (and whose family wasn’t tightly connected with politically powerful religious leaders) might as well be a feral child.
This feral child has seen hacks promoted and talent held back all her life. It nearly always ends badly. Although I’m sure somebody in the VRWC establishment will come through with another cushy job for Mr. Domenech, he’ll be remembered in the news/publishing biz as the guy who bombed out at WaPo. And it’s a shame, because in another ten or twenty years Mr. Domenech might be capable of being interesting, even if he’s still a rightie.
See also: Glenn Greenwald, Digby, Booman Tribune.
Update: See Jay Rosen at PressThink:
I wasn’t—in principle—against the Post.com hiring a Republican activist as an opinion writer. It didn’t bother me that Domenech lacks mainstream newsroom credentials, and doesn’t call himself a journalist. I found it more interesting than scandalous that he was home schooled. And to me it was an inspired thought to give a 24 year-old a blog at washingtonpost.com.
Today I might be defending Jim Brady and company for their decision— if…. If Ben Domenech were a writer with some grace, a conservative original, a voice, something new on the scene, a different breed of young Republican, with perspective enough on the culture war to realize that while he can’t avoid being in it, he can avoid being of it. I might even be sympathizing with Ben if he had been that kind of hire.
He wasn’t. That he wasn’t was suggested by his first post, Pachyderms in the Mist: Red America and the MSM, a strange and backward-facing thing the apparent purpose of which was once more to ridicule what Peggy Noonan called “the famous MSM.†And it is famous, as a construct that allows anyone to say anything about the news media without fear of contradiction. This was Ben:
Any red-blooded American conservative, even those who hold a dim view of Patrick Swayze’s acting “talent,†knows a Red Dawn reference. For all the talk of left wing cultural political correctness, the right has such things, too (DO shop at Wal-Mart, DON‘T buy gas from Citgo). But in the progressive halls of the mainstream media, such things prompt little or no recognition. For the MSM, Dan Rather is just another TV anchor, France is just another country and Red Dawn is just another cheesy throwaway Sunday afternoon movie.
I suppose this was supposed to mean that reporters, editors and producers in the nation’s newsrooms don’t know why Dan Rather is such a prized conservative scalp, or that the right hates the French. Besides being untrue, this was also an extremely ungracious statement, since the washingtonpost, was hiring Ben Domenech to bring the news about social conservatives to more Americans.
But in fact there is no MSM. No one answers for it. It has no address. And no real existence independent of the dreary statements (like Ben’s) in which it is bashed. Therefore it is not a term of accountability, which is one reason it’s so popular. No one’s accountable for what they say using it. If you’re a blogger, and you write things like, “The MSM swallowed it hook, line and sinker,†you should know that you have written gibberish. But you probably don’t, for to keep this knowledge from you is the leaden genius of MSM.
I hope Jay Rosen is not suggesting the MSM was wide awake and alert in 2002 and 2003; there was a reason why hundreds of thousands of Americans starting reading the BBC, The Guardian, the Knight Ridder Washington Bureau and a few lonely bloggers. I, for one, got tired of reading small very curious stories in the back pages of newspapers while the front pages told a different story and that small story in the back pages would not even appear on any of the network news shows (I’m speaking of things like energy dept. experts, the guys who actually know how to make a bomb, dismissing the administration’s aluminum tubes story).
For several years, Bush and other conservatives weren’t too worried about the MSM until it started showing signs of doing its job again.
By the way, there was a fundamental reason why the Knight Ridder Newspapers were scooping the larger outfits: not being a glamor outfit, they had almost no access to the top tier of Bush Administration officials and had to talk to lower level career people who knew all too well what was going on (and let’s keep in mind how often those low level officials were right).
One last point. The MSM has suffered from the star system for the last twenty-five years; this has caused a number of problems, the most significant being the reduction of the kind of staff that used to do more legwork on stories. Doing the legwork is where bloggers can be useful, though obviously some bloggers are better at it than others.
Pingback: Don Surber
Well, let’s give Ben credit for having enough sense to know when to cut and run. He was fraud and he knew it. Maybe he can land a gig with Central Command writing about military success stories in Iraq…I hear they’re hiring “talented” writers.
But in fact there is no MSM. No one answers for it. It has no address…
I understand the point you’re trying to make, but I would argue that there is indeed an unarticulated common set of beliefs and behaviors that this country’s traditional media institutions collectively embody and demonstrate, with enough consistency to cause others to both see certain patterns and find fault with them. The right finds their own set of faults with the MSM; the left has theirs.
As for Domenech, good riddance. Another right-wing underachiever.
Pingback: The Mahablog » Under the Radar